Continous process for producing polyol modified polyalkenylene terephthalate

ABSTRACT

The present invention relates to a continuous process for the production of polyol modified polyalkenylene terephthalates and the application of such polyol modified polyalkylene therephtalate on wire enamels.

The present application is a divisional application under 35 U.S.C. §120 of U.S. application Ser. No. 17/058,697, filed Nov. 25, 2020, theentire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.

The present invention relates to a continuous process for the productionof polyol modified polyalkenylene terephthalate.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Polyol modified polyalkylene terephthalate are well establishedmaterials used in the production of wire enamels and especiallytris(2-hydroxyethyl)isocyanurate containing polyesters have been widelyused as magnet wire coatings.

Polyol modified polyalkylene terephthalate can be produced viapolycondenstation of the corresponding monomers or viatransesterification of polyesters, usually in batch reactors asdescribed e.g. in U.S. Pat. No. 4,849,465. The disadvantages of thisprocess are that working with batch reactors it is time consuming andmonomers as well as the resulting polymer must be dissolved in asolvent, usually cresylic solvents.

Cresylic solvents are classified as hazardous to the environment. Whenpolyol modified polyalkylene terephthalates are produced viapolycondenstation water is formed as reaction product. The disposal ofsuch water is expensive because it is contaminated by the solvent.

Thus, for the production of polyol modified polyalkylene terephthalateon an industrial scale, there is still the need of a time and costsefficient process, which greatly reduces or does not involve the use ofa solvent.

These problems are solved by the process of the invention.

The present invention relates to a continuous process for producing apolyol modified polyalkyleneterephthalate comprising the steps of:

-   -   (a) introducing in a continuous reactor comprising a reaction        zone i) a polyalkylene terephthalate, ii) a polyol and iii) a        transesterification catalyst and one or more optional        components;    -   (b) reacting the introduced components in the reaction zone of        the reactor at a temperature in the range of 180° C. to 350° C.        to produce a polyol modified polyalkylene terephthalate;

wherein the polyol ii) of step a) is selected fromtris(2-hydroxyethyl)isocyanurate and glycerine, optionally furthercomprising a second polyol and

wherein step b) is performed in a melt of the polyalkylene terephthalatei).

The process of the invention is performed in a continuous reactor.Preferably the process of the invention is performed in an extruder. Inan extruder, high temperatures can be reached and this allows thehandling of polyalkylene therepthalate and its high viscosity in themelt phase. Conventional batch reactors cannot handle the hightemperatures or agitation needed to melt polyalkylene terephthalatewithout the use of solvents.

Accordingly, the process of the invention can be performed in a melt ofthe polyalkenylene terephthalate resulting in a greatly reduced use of asolvent to a process which can be performed without solvent.

According to the invention, melt of polyalkylene terephthalateoptionally comprises one or more solvents, wherein the amount of solventin the melt is lower than % by weight with respect to the polyalkyleneterephthalate charged in step a), more preferably in an amount lowerthan 15% by weight, more preferably in an amount lower than 10% byweight, more preferably in an amount lower than 5% by weight, morepreferably in an amount lower than 3% by weight more preferably in anamount lower than 2% by weight, more preferably in an amount lower than1% by weight.

In a preferred embodiment of the process of the invention, step b) isperformed in the melt of the polyalkylene terephthalate, wherein themelt of the polyalkylene terephthalate is substantially free of asolvent.

Substantially free of solvent, low or reduced amount of solvent meanthat the solvent is preferably in an amount lower than 20% by weightwith respect to the polyalkylene terephthalate charged in step a), morepreferably in an amount lower than 15% by weight, more preferably in anamount lower than 10% by weight, more preferably in an amount lower than5% by weight, more preferably in an amount lower than 3% by weight morepreferably in an amount lower than 2% by weight, more preferably in anamount lower than 1% by weight.

In a further preferred embodiment of the process of the invention stepb) is performed in the melt of polyalkylene terephthalate in the absenceof a solvent.

In a preferred embodiment of the process of the invention, thepolyalkylene terephthalate is polyethylene terephthalate or polybutyleneterephthalate.

In the process of the invention, polyols are used to modify polyalkyleneterephthalate.

A polyol is an organic compound containing multiple hydroxyl groups. Amolecule with two or more hydroxyl groups is a polyol, e.g., with two isa diol, with three is a triol, with four is a tetrol and so on.

Preferred polyols of the invention are polyols with two or threehydroxyl groups, most preferred with three hydroxyl groups.

More preferred polyols of the invention are selected fromtris(2-hydroxyethyl)isocyanurate and glycerine.

More preferred polyol as second polyol is selected fromtris(2-hydroxyethyl)isocyanurate, glycerine, trimetylolpropane,pentaerythritol and mixtures thereof.

Most preferred polyol is tris(2-hydroxyethyl)isocyanurate (THEIC).

As described in S. Inoue et al (Kobunshi Ronbunshu, Vol. 54, No. 6,pages 407-411, 1997), THEIC decomposes at 130° C. in the presence ofalkali metal oxide. Also U.S. Pat. No. 4,849,465 states that THEIC isnot stable under the presence of ethylene glycol excess. Analogously,the melting point of other suitable polyols is for example 260° C. forpentaerythritol, 60° C. for trimethylolpropane.

A polyalkylene terephthalate, preferably polyethylene terephthalate orpolybutylene terephthalate, melts at temperatures of at least 250° C.

It is therefore surprising that a transesterification reaction usingpolyols, which degrade or decompose at such a high temperature, wouldproduce a polyol modified polyalkylene therepthalate. In particular,considering that the decomposition reaction of the polyols in thepresence of a catalyst, as this is the case in this process, starts ateven lower temperatures.

In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the amount of polyol ii)introduced in step a) of the process of the invention is at least 0.5mol OH group per 100 g of polyalkylene terephthalate i).

More preferably, the amount of polyol ii) introduced in step a) of theprocess of the invention is in the range of 0.5 to 5 mol OH group per100 g of polyalkylene terephthalate i); more preferably, in the range of0.5 to 4 mol OH group per 100 g of polyalkylene terephthalate i); morepreferably, in the range of 0.5 to 3 mol OH group per 100 g ofpolyalkylene terephthalate i); more preferably, in the range of 0.5 to 2mol OH group per 100 g of polyalkylene terephthalate i).

In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the Mn molecular weight ofthe polyol modified polyalkylene terephthalate is in the range of 800 to3000 Daltons. Preferably, in the range of 800 to 2500 Daltons, morepreferably, in the range of 800 to 2000 Daltons.

In the process of the invention, the molecular weight of the polyolmodified polyalkylene terephthalate can be controlled adjusting thevacuum or pressure of the continuous reactor and/or the temperature. Theexcess of glycol, especially compared to the batch process, would causea very low molecular weight oligomer to be produced that would not makea satisfactory wire coating.

Through this adjustment the level of ethylene glycol as a reactionproduct can be controlled and as a consequence the desired molecularweight of the final product can be influenced.

One of the aims of the invention is to obtain a polyol modifiedpolyalkylene terephthalate by a continuous process having similarproperties of a polyol modified polyalkylene terephthalate obtained in abatch process. The polyol modified polyalkylene terephthalate obtainedby a continuous process of the invention can be used and applied,particularly on a wire enamel, in the same manner as in the batchprocess.

Within the meaning of the invention, a transesterification catalyst ii)introduced in step a) is an acid or a base catalyst able to catalyze atransesterification reaction of exchanging an organic group attached toan ester with the organic group attached to an alcohol.

For the scope of this invention, any catalyst suitable for atransesterification reaction can be used.

In a preferred embodiment of the process of the invention, thetransesterification catalyst iii) introduced in step a) is a lewis acid.

In a preferred embodiment of the process of the invention, the lewisacid selected from titanium compounds, zinc compounds, antimonycompounds, zirconium compounds, germanium compounds, ionic liquids andlead compounds.

In a most preferred embodiment of the invention, the transesterificationcatalyst is selected from zinc acetate and tetra-n-butyl titanate(TNBT).

In a preferred embodiment, the transesterification catalyst is presentin an amount of at least 100 ppm calculated on the sum of components i),ii) and iii). Preferably the transesterification catalyst is in therange of 100 to 10000 ppm. More preferably in the range of 500 to 5000ppm and most preferably in the range from 1000 to 3000 ppm.

In a preferred embodiment, the extruder or the continuous reactor usedin the process of the invention has different temperature zones.Preferably, the extruder or the continuous reactor has a feed zone andone or more reaction zones.

A feed or feeding zone is a zone of the continuous reactor wherein thecomponents are introduced into the reactor.

A reaction zone is a zone of the continuous reactor wherein a reactiontakes place. In a continuous reactor one or more reaction zones can bepresent. Preferably, the continuous reactor of the invention has one,two, three or four reaction zones.

In a preferred embodiment, all the zones may work at differenttemperatures.

In a further preferred embodiment, the feed zone and the reaction zoneswork at the same temperature.

In another preferred embodiment, the feed zone has a lower temperaturethan the reaction zone(s).

For the avoidance of doubt, within the meaning of the invention, anyzone of the continuous reactor or of the extruder, which is not afeeding zone, is a reaction zone.

Preferably, the feed zone of the reactor has a temperature in the rangeof 100° C. to 300° C., preferably in the range of 100° C. to 200° C.,more preferably, the feed zone of the reactor has a temperature in therange of 100° C. to 150° C.

Preferably, the temperature of each of the reaction zone of the reactorcan be the same or different and it is in the range of 200° C. to 350°C., more preferably, in the range of 250° C. to 350° C., more preferablyin the range of 250° C. to 320° C., more preferably, in the range of270° C. to 350° C., most preferably in the range of 270° C. to 320° C.

In another embodiment, each of the reaction zone works at the sametemperature.

In another embodiment, each of the reaction zone works at two, three orfour different temperatures.

In another preferred embodiment of the process of the invention, eachtemperature zone of the extruder works at a different temperature.

In a preferred embodiment of the invention, components i) a polyalkyleneterephthalate, ii) a polyol and iii) a transesterification catalyst areintroduced in the reactor in step a) through the feeding zone.

Optionally, additives or a low amount of one or more solvents,preferably one solvent, is introduced in the reactor through the feedingzone.

In another embodiment, the process of the invention further comprisesthe step c) of removing the polyol modified polyalkylene terephthalatefrom the reactor.

In another embodiment, the process of the invention further comprisesthe step c) of removing the polyol modified polyalkylene terephthalatefrom the reactor and step d) of dissolving the polyol modifiedpolyalkylene terephthalate in a solvent producing a dissolved polyolmodified polyalkylene terephthalate.

In another embodiment, the process of the invention further comprisesthe step e) of applying the dissolved polyol modified polyalkyleneterephthalate on a wire, optionally in the presence of one or morefurther components selected from additives and diluents and optionallyin the presence of one or more solvents, preferably one solvent.

In another embodiment, the invention relates to a process for dissolvingthe polyol modified polyalkylene terephthalate obtained by the processof the invention for producing polyol modified polyalkyleneterephthalate, wherein the process of the invention is followed by stepd) of dissolving the polyol modified polyalkylene terephthalate in asolvent producing a dissolved polyol modified polylakyleneterephthalate. Optionally in step d) one or more further componentsselected from additives and diluents are added to the dissolved polyolmodified polyalkylene terephthalate.

In another embodiment the invention relates to a process for applying ona wire a dissolved polyol modified polyalkylene terephthalate obtainedby the process for dissolving the polyol modified polyakyleneterephthalate obtained by the process of the invention for producingpolyol modified polyalkylene terephthalate, wherein the process fordissolving the polyol modified polyakylene terephthalate, is followed bythe step of applying the dissolved polyol modified poylakyleneterephthalate on a wire. Optionally, one or more further componentsselected from additives and diluents are added to the dissolved polyolmodified polyalkylene terephthalate.

Within the meaning of the invention, solvents used in the melt of thepolyalkenylene terephthalate are solvents able to dissolve thepolyalkenylene terephthalate and preferably they are suitable for wireenamels applications.

Preferred solvents are cresylic or phenolic solvents. Preferablycresylic acid, phenol or mixtures thereof.

In a preferred embodiment of the process of the invention, the dissolvedpolyol modified polyalkylelene terephthalate further comprisesadditives.

In a preferred embodiment of the process of the invention, one or morecomponents selected from additives are introduced in the reactor in stepa).

In another preferred embodiment of the process of the invention, a lowamount of one or more solvents, preferably one, is introduced in thereactor in step a).

In a preferred embodiment of the process of the invention, the additivesare selected from phenolic resins, blocked isocyanate, tetra-n-butyltitanate (TNBT), diluents and flow additives.

Flow additive are materials such as silicone fluid which improves thecoating surface.

Diluents are for example Solvent 100, xylene and other solvents, whichare introduced to reduce the viscosity of the polymers of the invention.

In a most preferred embodiment, the invention relates to a continuousprocess for producing tris(2-hydroxyethyl)isocyanurate modifiedpolyethylene terephthalate, comprising the steps of

-   -   (a) introducing in an extruder comprising a reaction zone i)        polyethylene terephthalate, ii)        tris(2-hydroxyethyl)isocyanurate, iii) a transesterification        catalyst selected from zinc acetate or tetra-n-butyl titanate        and one or more optional components;    -   (b) reacting the introduced components in the reaction zone of        the extruder at a temperature in the range of 250° C. to 350° C.        to produce a tris(2-hydroxyethyl)isocyanurate modified        polyethylene terephthalate;

wherein step b) is performed a melt of the polyethylene terephthalatepreferably substantially free of solvent, more preferably in the absenceof a solvent.

The present invention is explained in more details by the followingexamples.

List of Abbreviations

PET polyethylentherephtalatePBT polybutyleneterephthalateTHEIC tris(2-hydroxyethyl)isocyanurateRPM revolutions per minuteTNBT tetra-n-butyl titanateGPC gel permeation chromatographyTMP trimethylolpropaneTHF tetrahydrofuranM_(n) number average molecular weightM_(w) weight average molecular weight

EXAMPLES

All experiments were performed using a Brabender Co-Rotating ClamshellTwin Screw Extruder Model 20/40D. The extruder contained 4 heatingzones, a die adapter heating zone and a die heating zone. If nototherwise specified, the first heating zone is the feeding zone and theremaining zones are reaction zones. The screw design contained forwardand reverse conveying elements, forward and reverse kneading blocks, andteeth elements. Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) (SKC Films Inc.) wasfed through a single spiral screw volumetric feeder. Tris(2-hydroxyethyl) isocyanurate (THEIC) as well as cyanuric acid were fedthrough either a twin concave screw volumetric feeder or a single augerscrew volumetric feeder. Either zinc acetate or tetra-n-butyl titanate(TNBT) were used as catalysts and premixed with the THEIC or PET. Whenthe amount of a catalyst is given in weight %, such amount is calculatedbased on the total weight of the components. All materials were dosedthrough a 3 L stainless steel hopper. No additional equipment was usedunless otherwise specified.

Example 1 (Comparative)

PET was fed with all temperature zones set to 270° C. The PET feed ratewas 15 g/min and the extruder screw speed was set at 100 RPM. The PETexited the extruder as a melt and was collected into cans and cooled.The resulting product was solid at room temperature and insoluble inTHF. Sample could not be measured by GPC in tetrahydrofuran (THF).Probably, the molecular weight of the resulting polymer is too high andtherefore it could not be solved in THF.

Example 2 (Comparative)

PET and THEIC were fed with no catalyst and with all zones set to 270°C. The rates of feed of the PET and THEIC were 15 g/min and 12 g/minrespectively. The extruder screw speed was set at 100 RPM. The resultingplastic exited the extruder as a melt and was collected into cans andcooled. The resulting product was solid at room temperature and mostlyinsoluble in THF. Decomposition was observed by darkening of thematerial. Sample could not be measured by GPC in THF.

Example 3

PET and THEIC/Zinc acetate catalyst premix were fed with all zones setto 270° C. The catalyst loading was 0.43% by weight. The rates of feedof the PET and THEIC premix were 15 g/min and 12 g/min respectively,corresponding to 0.92 mol OH per 100 g PET. The extruder screw speed wasset at 100 RPM. The resulting polyol modified PET exited the extruder asa melt and was collected into cans and cooled. The clear product wassoluble in THF and further characterized by GPC. The number and weightaverage molecular weight is comparable to batch produced THEIC polyesterpolymer used in wire enamel coatings. Infrared spectrum is consistentwith THEIC polyester polymer produced by the conventional batch process.¹H and ¹³C NMR are also consistent with material produced by batchprocess.

Example 4

PET and THEIC/Zinc acetate catalyst premix were fed with all zones setto 300° C. The catalyst loading was 0.43% by weight. The rates of feedof the PET and THEIC premix were 15 g/min and 12 g/min respectively,corresponding to 0.92 mol OH per 100 g PET. The extruder screw speed wasset at 100 RPM. The resulting polyol modified PET exited the extruder asa melt and was collected into cans and cooled. The clear product wassoluble in THF and further characterized by GPC. The number and weightaverage molecular weight is comparable to batch produced THEIC polyesterpolymer used in wire enamel coatings. Infrared spectrum is consistentwith THEIC polyester polymer produced by the conventional batch process.¹H and ¹³C NMR are also consistent with material produced by batchprocess.

Example 5

PET and THEIC/Zinc acetate catalyst premix were fed with all zones setto 270° C. The catalyst loading was 0.86% by weight. The rates of feedof the PET and THEIC premix were 15 g/min and 12 g/min respectively,corresponding to 0.92 mol OH per 100 g PET. The extruder screw speed wasset at 100 RPM. The resulting polyol modified PET exited the extruder asa melt and was collected into cans and cooled. The clear product wassoluble in THF and further characterized by GPC. The number and weightaverage molecular weight is comparable to batch produced THEIC polyesterpolymer used in wire enamel coatings. Infrared spectrum is consistentwith THEIC polyester polymer produced by the conventional batch process.¹H and ¹³C NMR are also consistent with material produced by batchprocess.

Example 6 (Batch Process)

Terephthalic acid (190 g), THEIC (170 g), ethylene glycol (52 g) andtetrabutyltitanate catalyst (0.4 g) were added to flask with mechanicalstirring, nitrogen purge and heating mantel. Cresylic acid solvent (30g) was added. The components were heated to a temperature of 220° C.with removal of water to form a clear plastic resin after 12 hours. Theclear product was soluble in THF and further characterized by GPC.Infrared spectrum, ¹H and ¹³C NMR were taken after removal of thecresylic acid solvent.

From examples 1-6 it is apparent that with use of a continuous reactoror extruder one can produce a THEIC polyester that is comparable to thebatch process. It is also critical that PET, polyol and catalyst bepresent for the reaction to take place in a reasonable amount of time.Higher loading levels of catalyst also increase the rate of reaction.

Example M_(n) (g mol⁻¹) M_(w) (g mol⁻¹) 1 (comparative) Not soluble Notsoluble 2 (comparative) Not soluble Not soluble 3 1129 2235 4 1752 73635 1230 2737 6 (batch) 1391 4451

Example 9

PET and THEIC/Zinc acetate catalyst premix were fed with the feed zoneset at 100° C., second zone set to 270° C., and the remaining two zonesset to 315° C. respectively. The catalyst loading was 0.86% by weight.The rates of feed of the PET and THEIC premix were 47 g/min and 36 g/minrespectively, corresponding to 0.87 mol OH per 100 g PET. The extruderscrew speed was set at 250 RPM. The resulting polyol modified PET exitedthe extruder as a melt and was collected into cans and cooled. Theresidence time through the extruder was 45 seconds. The clear productwas soluble in THF and further characterized by GPC. Infrared spectrumis consistent with THEIC polyester polymer produced by the conventionalbatch process. ¹H and ¹³C NMR are also consistent with material producedby batch process.

Example 10

PET and THEIC/Zinc acetate catalyst premix were fed with the feed zoneset at 100° C., second zone set to 270° C., and the remaining two zonesset to 325° C. respectively. The catalyst loading was 0.86% by weight.The rates of feed of the PET and THEIC premix were 47 g/min and 36 g/minrespectively, corresponding to 0.87 mol OH per 100 g PET. The extruderscrew speed was set at 250 RPM. The resulting polyol modified PET exitedthe extruder as a melt and was collected into cans and cooled. Theresidence time through the extruder was 45 seconds. The clear productwas soluble in THF and further characterized by GPC. Infrared spectrumis consistent with THEIC polyester polymer produced by the conventionalbatch process. ¹H and ¹³C NMR are also consistent with material producedby batch process.

Examples 9 and 10 demonstrate that elevated temperatures of greater than300° C. can be successfully used to produce modified polyester resincomparable to the batch process.

Example M_(n) (g mol⁻¹) M_(w) (g mol⁻¹)  9 1346 3306 10 1452 4542

Examples 15 and 17

PET and THEIC/TNBT catalyst premix were fed with the feed zone set at120° C., and the remaining zones set to 285° C. or 300° C. respectively.The catalyst loading was 0.20% by weight. The rates of feed of the PETand THEIC premix were 21 g/min and 15 g/min respectively, correspondingto 0.81 mol OH per 100 g PET. The extruder screw speed was set at 250RPM. The resulting polyol modified PET exited the extruder as a melt andwas collected into cans and cooled. The residence time through theextruder was 130 seconds. The clear product was soluble in THF andfurther characterized by GPC. Infrared spectrum is consistent with THEICpolyester polymer produced by the conventional batch process. ¹H and ¹³CNMR are also consistent with material produced by batch process.

Examples 15 and 17 demonstrate that alternate lewis acid catalysts canbe used to produce a THEIC polyester with comparable properties to thebatch process.

Example M_(n) (g mol⁻¹) M_(w) (g mol⁻¹) 15 1471 3854 17 1667 5301

Examples 23, 25 and 26

PET and THEIC/TNBT catalyst premix were fed with the feed zone set at130° C. and the remaining zones set to 290° C., 310° C., or 320° C.,respectively. The catalyst loading was 0.20% by weight. The rates offeed of the PET and THEIC premix were 58 g/min and 42 g/minrespectively, corresponding to 0.83 mol OH per 100 g PET. The extruderscrew speed was set at 350 RPM. The resulting polyol modified PET exitedthe extruder as a melt and was collected into cans and cooled.

Examples 23-26 show that temperature can be used to control themolecular weight of the resulting THEIC polyester resin. Highertemperatures gave material with higher molecular weight.

Example M_(n) (g mol⁻¹) M_(w) (g mol⁻¹) 23 1433 3551 25 1583 4584 261669 5651

Examples 31-32

PET and a trimethylolpropane (TMP)/TNBT catalyst premix were fed withthe feed zone set at 100° C. and the remaining zones set to 310° C. or320° C. The catalyst loading was 0.20% by weight. The rates of feed ofthe PET and TMP premix were 29 g/min and 22 g/min respectively,corresponding to 1.67 mol OH per 100 g PET. The extruder screw speed wasset at 250 RPM. The resulting polyol modified PET exited the extruder asa melt and was collected into cans and cooled in ambient conditions.

Example 36

PET and a glycerin/TNBT catalyst premix were fed with the feed zone setat 100° C. and the remaining zones set to 320° C. The catalyst loadingwas 0.20% by weight. The rates of feed of the PET and glycerin premixwere 30 g/min and 10 g/min respectively, corresponding to 1.1 mol OH per100 g PET. This system contained excess glycerin. The extruder screwspeed was set at 250 RPM. The resulting polyol modified PET exited theextruder as a melt and was collected into cans and cooled.

Examples 31, 32 and 36 demonstrate that alternate polyols can be used inaddition to THEIC to produce a modified polyester.

Example M_(n) (g mol⁻¹) M_(w) (g mol⁻¹) 31  862 1406 32 1076 1966 361449 3032

Examples 38-39

Polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) and a THEIC/TNBT catalyst premix werefed with the feed zone set at 100° C. and the remaining zones set to300° C., or 320° C. The catalyst loading was 0.20% by weight. The ratesof feed of the PBT and THEIC premix were 20 g/min and 13 g/minrespectively, corresponding to 0.75 mol OH per 100 g PET. The extruderscrew speed was set at 250 RPM. The resulting polyol modified PET exitedthe extruder as a melt and was collected into cans and cooled. The clearproduct was soluble in THF and further characterized by GPC. The numberand weight average molecular weight is comparable to batch producedTHEIC polyester polymer used in wire enamel coatings. The infraredspectrum is consistent with THEIC polyester.

Example M_(n) (g mol⁻¹) M_(w) (g mol⁻¹) 38 1403 3462 39 1977 7465

Magnet Wire Coatings: The resin from example 17 and control sample 6were used as the polymers for a magnet wire coating.

Example 40

Resin from control Example 6 (300 g) was dissolved in 100 g of cresylicacid and 300 g of phenol. Solvent 100 (225 g) diluent was then added.Phenolic 877-R-50 (35 g) was then added along with Desmodur CT stable(25 g). Tetrabutyltitanate (16 g) crosslinker was finally added. Themixture was enameled on 1.0 mm copper wire monolithically and as basecoat with a standard Polyamideimide top coat (75:25 thickness) using aconventional magnet wire oven (MAG).

Example 41

Resin from control Example 17 (300 g) was dissolved in 100 g of cresylicacid and 300 g of phenol. Solvent 100 (225 g) diluent was then added.Phenolic 877-R-50 (35 g) was then added along with Desmodur CT stable(25 g). Tetrabutyltitanate (16 g) crosslinker was finally added. Themixture was enameled on 1.0 mm copper wire monolithically and as basecoat with a standard Polyamideimide top coat (75:25 thickness) using aconventional magnet wire oven (MAG).

The resin solutions were checked for viscosity and found to beequivalent at roughly 500 cP at 25° C. Each coating was then applied toa steel panel by a knife coater and cured in an oven at 260° C. for 30minutes. A sample of the panel was then analyzed by TMA for glasstransition (Tg). Examples 40 and 41 were found to have equivalent glasstransition points.

Sample μ [cP] Tg [° C.] Example 40 500 164 Example 41 474 162

Mechanical Properties on wire are shown in the tables below. The batchprocess enamel (Example 40) was comparable in properties to the materialsynthesized by the continuous process (Example 41).

Mandrel Test 1× Diameter with Pre-Stretching %

Example Example 40/PAI Top Example 40 41/PAI Top % coat (control)(control) coat Example 41  0 3/3 3/3 3/3 3/3  5 3/3 3/3 3/3 3/3 10 3/33/3 3/3 3/3 15 3/3 3/3 3/3 3/3 20 3/3 3/3 3/3 3/3 25 3/3 3/3 3/3 3/3 303/3 3/3 3/3 3/3

Peel Test

Example Example 40/PAI Top Example 40 41/PAI Top coat (control)(control) coat Example 41 Twists 184 134 194 140

Tan Delta

Example Example 40/PAI Top Example 40 41/PAI Top coat (control)(control) coat Example 41 ° C. 166.6 166.3 162.9 167.2

Cut-Through Large Plate

Example 40/PAI Example Example Top coat 40 41/PAI Top (control)(control) coat Example 41 ° C. 420 430 410 420

Measurements

GPC measurement were performed using Agilent Infinity 1260 GPC. TheInfinity GPC is equipped with an Infinity 1260 Degasser. The InfinityGPC is equipped with an isocratic pump that is also model numberInifinity 1260. The serial number is DEAB902598. Next the Infinity GPCcontains attachments for thermostating the GPC columns and autosamplerfeatures. The solvent is tetrahydrofuran (THF) and supplied byHoneywell. The purity is 99.9% with a peroxide level of less than 2mg/L. Samples to be analyzed are first dissolved in THF with mildagitation. The sample is then filtered through a 5 mL syringe with a 0.5micron filter filter housing. The solution is collected with a 5 mL vialsuitable for the autosampler. A lid with a rubber septum is then crimpedonto the vial using an Agilent supplied vial crimper. After all thesamples have been loaded into the autosampler, the method is started.The method is set to a flow rate of 1 mL/min of THF through a mixed Dcolumn (2 in series) supplied by Phenomenex. The mixed D columns arethermostated at 40° C. and the refractive index detector is baselinezeroed. The effluent is collected in a suitable container with properventing. Samples are injected on the column per the method with aninjection volume of 0.5 microliters per injection. The refractive indexdetector is thermostated at 40° C. also to prevent signal drift. Thesignal polarity is positive. The maximum pressure allowed on the columnset is 600 bar. Analysis was performed with Agilent Chemstationsoftware. Reference samples of polystyrene purchased from Agilent arerun in a similar fashion to develop a calibration curve. The standardsrange in molecular weight of 500 to 30,000 Daltons. The calibrationcurve can be a linear fit or first order or second order depending onthe column set utilized. In this experiment we used a first order fit.

Flexibility or Mandrel Test was performed according to the procedure IECEN 60851-3. Therein it is described the Mandrel winding test. Coatedwires were taken as such and pre-stretched at 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%,30%. For each measurement point three probes were prepared. Each wirewas wound around a polished mandrel, a piece of steel having the samediameter as the wire. Once the wire was on the mandrel, the presence ofcracks was checked. The absence of cracks gives the flexibility of thecoated wire.

Peel Test was performed according to the procedure IEC EN 60851-3.Therein it is described the peel test applicable to enameled round wirewith a nominal conductor diameter over 1000 mm.

Tan delta was measured using Dansk tangent delta instrument.

Cut Through Large Plate was measured using Nova 1005 ThermoplasticCut-Through Tester that meets the NEMA-MW1000 and the JIS C3003specifications.

1H and 13C NMR spectra were measured using 500 MHz Varian NMR in CDCl3.

FT-IR was measured using Thermoscientific Nicolet FT-IR using ATRattachment. Viscosity was measured using Brookfield LV viscometer.

Tg was measured using TA Instruments Thermomechanical Analyzer using apenetration probe. The heating rate was 10° C. per minute.

1. A process for dissolving a polyol modified polyalkyleneterephthalate, the process comprising: dissolving a polyol modifiedpolyalkylene terephthalate in a solvent to produce a dissolved polyolmodified polyalkylene terephthalate, the polyol modified polyalkyleneterephthalate having been obtained by a continuous process comprising:introducing components in a continuous reactor comprising a reactionzone, the components including a polyalkylene terephthalate, a polyol,and a transesterification catalyst; reacting the components in thereaction zone of the reactor at a temperature in the range of 180° C. to350° C. to produce the polyol modified polyalkylene terephthalate;wherein the polyol includes one or more of tris(2-hydroxyethyl)isocyanurate and glycerine, and wherein reacting the components isperformed in a melt of the polyalkylene terephthalate.
 2. A process forapplying a polyol modified polyalkylene terephthalate on a wire, theprocess comprising: applying a polyol modified polyalkyleneterephthalate on a wire, the polyol modified polyalkylene terephthalatehaving been obtained by a continuous process comprising: introducingcomponents in a continuous reactor comprising a reaction zone, thecomponents including a polyalkylene terephthalate, a polyol, and atransesterification catalyst; reacting the components in the reactionzone of the reactor at a temperature in the range of 180° C. to 350° C.to produce the polyol modified polyalkylene terephthalate; wherein thepolyol includes one or more of tris(2-hydroxyethyl) isocyanurate andglycerine, and wherein reacting the components is performed in a melt ofthe polyalkylene terephthalate.
 3. A process for applying a dissolvedpolyol modified polyalkylene terephthalate on a wire, the processcomprising: applying the dissolved polyol modified polyalkyleneterephthalate obtained in the process of claim 1 on a wire.
 4. Theprocess of claim 1, further comprising adding one or more of an additiveand a diluent to the dissolved polyol modified polyalkyleneterephthalate.
 5. The process of claim 2, wherein applying the polyolmodified polyalkylene terephthalate on the wire is conducted in thepresence of a solvent.
 6. The process of claim 2, further comprisingadding one or more of an additive and a diluent to the polyol modifiedpolyalkylene terephthalate.
 7. The process of claim 5, furthercomprising adding one or more of an additive and a diluent to the polyolmodified polyalkylene terephthalate.
 8. The process of claim 3, furthercomprising adding one or more of an additive and a diluent to thedissolved polyol modified polyalkylene terephthalate.
 9. A polyolmodified polyalkylene terephthalate prepared by a continuous processcomprising: introducing components in a continuous reactor comprising areaction zone, the components including a polyalkylene terephthalate, apolyol, and a transesterification catalyst; reacting the components inthe reaction zone of the reactor at a temperature in the range of 180°C. to 350° C. to produce the polyol modified polyalkylene terephthalate;wherein the polyol includes one or more of tris(2-hydroxyethyl)isocyanurate and glycerine, and wherein reacting the components isperformed in a melt of the polyalkylene terephthalate.
 10. The polyolmodified polyalkylene terephthalate of claim 8, wherein the polyalkyleneterephthalate is polyethylene terephthalate or polybutyleneterephthalate.
 11. The polyol modified polyalkylene terephthalate ofclaim 8, wherein the polyol further comprises one or more oftrimetylolpropane and pentaerythritol.
 12. A dissolved polyalkyleneterephthalate prepared by the process of claim 1.